Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Department Seminar Series NEVENA RADOYNOVSKA - KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT - December 7th 2017


The Management Department
Department Seminar Series

Nevena Radoynovska

KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT



 Thursday, December 7th 2017
   Room N517 at 10:00 am (5.00 p.m in Singapore)


ThemeEntrepreneuring Your Life” or Entrepreneurship for Growth: Means Versus Ends-Based Theories of Social Impact Through Entrepreneurship”



      Abstract: "How do organizational actors in local entrepreneurial ecosystems understand their role in tackling “grand challenges” and effecting social change? National governments and supranational institutions increasingly promote entrepreneurship as a solution to socio-economic disparities across individuals, communities and regions. Yet, despite impressive growth in public and scholarly attention to the latter, we know surprisingly little about how, and to what extent, such initiatives succeed or fail in achieving social impact. This paper argues that a primary reason for the inconclusive evidence is that, although scholarship has recognized the multifaceted nature of the input (different forms of entrepreneurship), it assumes a much narrower conceptualization of the outcome (social impact), without adequately examining how organizations construe their role in effecting social change. This paper builds on recent theoretical frameworks for understanding the role of private organizations in positive social change by studying an initiative to promote entrepreneurship in disadvantaged communities in France (colloquially known as banlieues). I take a grounded-theory approach, relying on 46 interviews with entrepreneurs and organizations that support entrepreneurs(hip) in the banlieues, as well as archival and observational data. I theorize that what appears to be a broad policy towards reducing community inequalities through entrepreneurship is translated locally by organizations as two distinct approaches: a means- versus an ends-based approach. Notably, the latter constitute divergent organizational theories of social impact, based on different (1) targets of impact, (2) measures of impact, and (3) identified barriers to achieving impact, across multiple levels (individual, community, societal). Ultimately, means- versus ends-based theories carry distinct implications for evaluating organizations’ social impact. The paper contributes to a cross-level perspective on the relationship between organizations, entrepreneurship, and positive social change."

Department Seminar Series NISHANI BOURMAULT - NEOMA - November 14th 2017


The Management Department
Department Seminar Series

NISHANI BOURMAULT

NEOMA


Tuesday, November 14th 2017
   Room N231 at 10:00 am (5.00 p.m in Singapore)


Theme“When Stepping Up Also Means Stepping Down: Managerial Role Transitions for Members of High Reliability Occupations”



Abstract: "In past literature on work transitions into managerial roles, a key challenge for newcomers is assumed to be the increase in responsibility that the new job entails. However, little attention has been paid to individuals’ occupational backgrounds before transitioning. To better understand managerial transitions, this study compares the shifting responsibilities of supervisors coming from a high-reliability occupation, where small errors can lead to serious consequences, versus a low-reliability occupation, where such concerns do not exist. Drawing mainly on interviews with former Paris subway drivers (high-reliability) and station agents (low-reliability) now promoted to supervisors, we analyze the change in “responsibility” experienced during such a transition. We find that this responsibility has multiple facets, some of which actually lessen as one moves up. For subway drivers, stepping up into a managerial role entails lower task significance, lower temporal immediacy, and lower task independence; creating a certain loss of what we label “personal” responsibility. By contrast, former station agents reported no such loss. Building on the imprinting literature, we suggest that workers coming from high-reliability occupations might experience a similar “managerial blues.” Overall, our findings shed light on how specific occupational backgrounds shape the experience of responsibility when moving up the hierarchy."